

|
Browse Profiles > Ecuador > International Financial Reporting Standards |
| Score | Rank | |
| Standards Compliance Index | 22.50 out of 100 | 63 |
| Business Indicator Index | 6.16 out of 12 | 59 |
Ecuador|
International Financial Reporting Standards
According to a 2004 World Bank assessment of Ecuadorian accounting and auditing practices, domestic companies follow the Ecuadorian Accounting Standards (NECs), which are based on the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as they existed in 1999-2000. IFRSs have been revised since then and, consequently, the Ecuadorian standards fail to provide guidance in a number of sensitive accounting areas, thus undermining the quality of the available financial information. Banks and insurance companies follow accounting requirements set by the Superintendency of Banks and Insurance (SBS). These requirements, according to the World Bank, differ from IFRSs. It was therefore recommended that all public interest entities adopt and require mandatory application of IFRSs, and that the accounting principles for financial institutions and insurance companies be harmonized with the rest of the corporate sector. Furthermore, the World Bank suggested providing simplified accounting standards for small and medium sized enterprises. As far as the enforcement of accounting and auditing standards is concerned, the World Bank observed that both the Superintendency of Companies and the SBS, each of which is tasked with ensuring compliance with the financial reporting requirements, need to improve their practices in this regard. General Overview Accounting and auditing requirements for corporate entities in Ecuador are governed by the Companies Law of 1999. This law mandates that the financial statements be prepared in accordance with the standards issued by the Superintendency of Companies (SCE). The SCE adopted the Ecuadorian Accounting Standards (NECs) issued in 1999-2000 by the National Federation of Accountants of Ecuador (FNCE) as a result of a collective undertaking of a group of seven audit firms to develop national reporting standards. In 2004, the World Bank conducted a review of the accounting and auditing environment in Ecuador. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) (formerly known as International Accounting Standards, or IASs) and International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) were used as the benchmarks for assessing national standards. The Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) published as a result of the review concluded that, in Ecuador, "the standards were developed on the basis of respectively IAS and ISA, through the translation into Spanish of the original text in English" (p. 9). Since Ecuadorian translations were done without any international cooperation, the World Bank found differences between the text of the Ecuadorian standards and other existing translations of IFRSs into Spanish. Most importantly, the World Bank assessment noted that, despite being based on IFRSs, the NECs are "significantly less complete" as there is no continuing process for updating accounting or auditing standards in Ecuador. The World Bank, therefore, recommended the adoption and mandatory application of IFRSs by all public interest entities.The Principles
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the text of NEC 21, Business Combinations, the corresponding Ecuadorian standard, the standard has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2001. NEC 21 is based on IAS 22 (later superseded by IFRS3) as revised in 1998.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the text of NEC 2, the corresponding Ecuadorian standard, the standard has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. NEC 2 is based on IAS 30 (later superseded by IFRS 7) as revised in 1994.
According to the text of NEC 1, the corresponding Ecuadorian standard, the standard has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. NEC 1 is based on IAS 1 revised in 1997 and IAS 5 (later withdrawn) revised in 1994. However, the above mentioned international standards differfrom the version in effect as of August 2008.
According to the text of NEC 11, the corresponding Ecuadorian standard, the standard has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. NEC 11 is based on IAS 2 revised in 1993. However, the above mentioned international standard differs from the version in effect as of August 2008.
According to the text of NEC 3, the corresponding Ecuadorian standard, the standard has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. NEC 3 is based on IAS 7 revised in 1993. No information on the extent of compliance of NEC 3 with IAS 7 is publicly available.
According to the text of NEC 5, the corresponding Ecuadorian standard, the standard has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. NEC 5 is based on IAS 8 revised in 1993. However, the above mentioned international standard differs from the version in effect as of August 2008.
According to the text of NEC 4, the corresponding Ecuadorian standard, the standard has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. NEC 4 is based on IAS 10 reformatted in 1994. However, the above mentioned international standard differs from the version in effect as of August 2008.
According to the text of NEC 15, at the time of adoption it was based on IAS 11 as revised in 1993. NEC 15 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. No information on the extent of compliance of NEC 15 with IAS 11 is publicly available.
According to the World Bank assessment, as of 2004, accounting for income taxes was not covered under NECs. .
NEC 8 deals with the issue of segment reporting. However, there is insufficient information publicly available as to the extent of compliance of NEC8 with IAS 14.
According to the text of NEC 12, at the time of adoption it was based on IAS 16 as revised in 1993. NEC 12 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. However, the above mentioned international standard differs from the version in effect as of August 2008.
According to the World Bank assessment, as of 2004, accounting for leases was not covered under NECs.
According to the text of NEC 9, at the time of the adoption the standard was based on IAS 18 revised 1993. NEC 9 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. However, no further information on the extent of compliance of NEC 9 with IAS 18 is publicly available.
According to the World Bank assessment, as of 2004, accounting for employee benefits was not covered under NECs. .
According to the text of NEC 24, at the time of the adoption the standard was based on IAS 20 effective 1995. NEC 24 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2001. However, no further information on the extent of compliance of NEC 24 with IAS 20 is publicly available.
According to the text of NEC 7, at the time of adoption it was based on IAS 21 as revised in 1993. NEC 7 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. However, the above mentioned international standard differs from the version in effect as of August 2008.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the text of NEC 6, at the time of adoption it was based on IAS 24 as reformatted in 1994. NEC 6 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1999. However, the above mentioned international standard differs from the version in effect as of August 2008.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the World Bank, as of 2004, the obligation to prepare consolidated financial statements was not enforced by the SCE. The report noted that, as of 2004, only banks and insurance companies have issued consolidated financial statements in Ecuador. Furthermore, the assessment explained that "this represents a potentially serious weakness as non-consolidated information provides an incomplete if not distorted presentation of companies' financial position and economic performance" (p. 3).
According to the text of NEC 20, at the time of adoption it was based on IAS 28 (later revised). NEC 20 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2001.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the World Bank assessment, as of 2004, NECs did not cover presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.
According to the text of NEC 23, at the time of adoption it was based on IAS 33 (later revised). NEC 23 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2001.
According to the World Bank assessment, as of 2004, NECs did not cover interim financial reporting.
According to the list of NECs available on the FNCE website, there is no corresponding standard in Ecuador.
According to the text of NEC 21, at the time of adoption it was based on IAS 21, revised in 1998. NEC 21 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2001. However, no further information on the extent of compliance of NEC 21 with IAS 37 is publicly available.
According to the text of NEC 25, at the time of adoption it was based on IAS 38 (later revised). NEC 25 has been effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2001.
According to the World Bank assessment, as of 2004, recognition and measurement of financial instruments was not covered under NECs. With regard to banks, the assessment noted that SBS rules differ from IAS 39 in the accounting for impairment losses
According to the World Bank assessment, as of 2004, accounting for investment property was not covered by the NECs. With regard to banks, the assessment noted that the SBS rules differ from the international requirements as "IAS 40 offers a different treatment for the measurement of this type of asset, including a cost or a fair value model" (p. 12).
According to the World Bank assessment, as of 2004, accounting for agriculture was not covered by NECs. |
Jump to other standards Sources of Assessment Elorrieta, A.M., "Disclosure and Transparency - Accounting and Auditing," Third Meeting of the Latin American Corporate Governance Roundtable, Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, Mexico City, Mexico 8-10 April, 2002. Available from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development website. Accessed on May 23, 2008. (Elorrieta 2002) Grant Thornton International, "Doing Business in Ecuador," 2002. Available from Grant Thornton International website. Accessed on May 23, 2008. (Grant Thornton 2002) World Bank, "Ecuador: Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) - Accounting and Auditing," March 2004. Available from World Bank website. Accessed on May 23, 2008. (WB 2004) Relevant Organizations Central Bank of Ecuador - Banco Central del Ecuador (BCE) (website in Spanish only) Institute of Accounting Research of Ecuador - Instituto de Investigaciones Contables del Ecuador (IICE) (website in Spanish only) Internal Revenue Service - Servicio de Rentas Internas (SRI) (website in Spanish only) Ministry of Economy and Finance - Ministerio de Economia y Finanzas (MEF) (website in Spanish only) National Federation of Accountants of Ecuador - Federacion Nacional de Contadores del Ecuador (FNCE) (website in Spanish only) National Securities Council - Consejo Nacional de Valores (CNV) (website in Spanish only) Superintendency of Banks and Insurance - Superintendencia de Bancos y Seguros (SBS) (website in Spanish only) Superintendency of Companies - Superintendencia de Compañías (SCE) (in Spanish only) Relevant Legislation/Regulation Companies Law Codification No. 000. RO/312, 1999 - Ley de Compañias Codificacion No. 000. RO/312, 1999 (in Spanish only) Ecuadorian Accounting Standards - Normas Ecuatorianas de Contabilidad (NEC) (in Spanish only) General Law on the Institutions of the Financial System, 2001 - Ley General de Instituciones del Sistema Financiero, 2001 (in Spanish only) Law on Accountants, Supreme Decree No. 1549, 1966 - Ley de Contadores, Decreto Supremo No. 1549, 1966 (in Spanish only) General Law on Insurance No. 74, 1965 - Ley General de Seguros No. 74, 1965 (in Spanish only) Securities Market Law No. 107, 1998 - Ley de Mercado de Valores No. 107, 1998 (with amendments through 2006) (in Spanish only) Law on Internal Tax Regime, 2004 - Ley de Regimen Tributario Interno, 2004 (in Spanish only) Superintendency of Banks and Insurance Unified Chart of Accounts, Resolution No. SBS-2002-0297, 2002 - Superintendecia de Bancos y Seguros Cátalogo Único de Cuentas, Resolución No. SBS-2002-0297, 2002 (in Spanish only) Resolutions of the National Securities Council - Resoluciones del Consejo Nacional de Valores (in Spanish only) Resolution of the National Federation of Accountants of Ecuador, 1996 Supplementary Sources International Federation of Accountants website. Accessed on May 23, 2008. (IFAC website) |