

|
Browse Profiles > Hungary > Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation |
| Score | Rank | |
| Standards Compliance Index | 66.67 out of 100 | 4 |
| Business Indicator Index | 10.98 out of 12 | 3 |
Hungary|
Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation
In 2005, the securities and financial market supervisor - the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority (PSZAF) - published a self-assessment on Hungary's compliance with the International Organization of Securities Commission's (IOSCO) Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation. The PSZAF found Hungary to be fully or broadly compliant with most of the principles. According to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) 2005 Financial System Stability Assessment Update, based on the 2000 Financial Stability Assessment Program, the regulatory and supervisory framework in Hungary was strengthened and considerable progress was made towards achieving a risk-based approach to supervision. Furthermore, the regulatory and supervisory regime conformed in most material respects with the principles, and was in line with relevant international standards. The extensiveness of securities regulation practices in Hungary was further reviewed in 2004 by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Securities Markets Legislation Assessment. This study concluded that securities regulation in Hungary was in "medium compliance" with the IOSCO Objectives and Principles. Weaknesses were identified by both assessments with regards to the PSZAF's lack of powers in issuing binding regulations. The securities markets in Hungary, which are still at an early stage of development, are mainly governed by the 2002 Capital Markets Act. The PSZAF was established in April 2000 as an integrated financial supervisory authority for the securities, banking, and insurance sectors. General Overview An assessment of Hungary's observance of the International Organization of Securities Commission's (IOSCO) Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation was carried out by the Financial Stability Assessment Program (FSAP) mission in 2000, and updated in the context of the 2002 Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA). According to the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, "Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the principles" (p. 33). Following the 2000 FSAP, per the 2005 report, the regulatory and supervisory framework in Hungary was strengthened and considerable progress was made towards achieving a risk-based approach to supervision. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was concluded between the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority (Pénzügyi Szervezetek Állami Felügyelete, or PSZAF), the Ministry of Finance (Miniszterelnöki Hivatal, or MoF), and the National Bank of Hungary (Magyar Nemzeti Bank). In its 2005 FSSA Update, the IMF noted that the regulatory and supervisory framework was in line with relevant international standards. The extensiveness of securities regulation practices in Hungary was further addressed in 2004 by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Securities Markets Legislation Assessment. The EBRD concluded that securities regulation in Hungary was in "medium compliance" with the IOSCO Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation. However, weaknesses were identified by both the IMF and EBRD assessments with regards to the PSZAF's lack of powers in issuing binding regulations. The 2002 IMF assessment, as reported in the 2005 FSSA Update, recommended improving the adequacy of staff resources, and coordinating sanctioning measures of the PSZAF and the Self Regulatory Organizations (SROs). It further advised the authorities to enhance the implementation and enforcement of international principles and ensure more stringent reporting standards for investment service providers (ISPs). In 2005, the PSZAF published a self-assessment on Hungary's compliance with the IOSCO Principles, and found Hungary to be fully or broadly compliant with most of the principles.The Principles
In its 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles, the PSZAF reported that this principle is fully implemented. According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, supervisory responsibilities of the PSZAF over the securities markets are regulated under the 1999 PSZAF Act, as amended following the 2002 Capital Markets Act. While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, it did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles, this principle is fully implemented. As stated in the IMF's 2002 FSSA, "the PSZAF's organizational structure, operations, and authority are generally consistent with the relevant portions of the IOSCO Principles" (p. 51). Furthermore, according to the World Bank's 2003 report on Corporate Governance, "the PSZAF is independent and self-financing, and is sufficiently empowered and staffed to carry out its supervisory functions" (p. 2). However, weaknesses were identified by the 2005 IMF FSSA Update with regard to the PSZAF's lack of power in issuing binding regulations.
This principle is broadly implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. As a follow-up to the IMF's 2002 FSSA recommendations, the PSZAF made efforts to improve its capacity to perform its functions and exercise its powers by increasing the number of staff and establishing a comprehensive IT system, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update. Furthermore, according to the World Bank's 2003 report on Corporate Governance, "the PSZAF is independent and self-financing, and is sufficiently empowered and staffed to carry out its supervisory functions" (p. 2). However, weaknesses were identified by the IMF's 2005 report with regard to the PSZAF's lack of power in issuing binding regulations.
This principle is broadly implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. According to the IMF's 2002 FSSA, "the PSZAF's organizational structure, operations, and authority are generally consistent with the relevant portions of the IOSCO Principles" (p. 51). While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, it did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles, this principle is fully implemented. While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, it did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles, this principle is fully implemented. As reported in the 2005 FSSA Update, the 2002 IMF assessment indicated that there was a shared competence between the PSZAF and the self-regulatory organizations (SROs), in which the SROs sanctioned market participants and major offenses were reported to the PSZAF. Furthermore, the PSZAF was in regular contact with the SROs by approving their internal rules. The IMF report advised the PSZAF to conduct a detailed oversight of the SROs at least once a year. It further recommended coordinating the sanctioning measures of the PSZAF and the SROs. While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, it did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
See Principle 6.
As noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles, this principle is fully implemented. By law, according to the IMF's 2002 assessment, "the PSZAF is authorized to inspect and investigate organizations subject to its regulatory oversight" (p. 51). It is also responsible for the prudential supervision of ISPs. Furthermore it has legal powers "to inspect books, documents, and other relevant information or to request the submission of extraordinary reports, statements and audit reports" (p. 51). The 2002 IMF assessment, as reported in the 2005 FSSA Update, encouraged the authorities to enhance the implementation and enforcement of international principles, and ensure more stringent reporting standards for ISPs. Amendments to the law in 2003 empowered the PSZAF to conduct risk-based inspections, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the supervisory framework. Furthermore, comprehensive inspections are carried out twice a year.
According to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles, this principle is fully implemented. Enforcement powers of the PSZAF were strengthened under the Capital Markets Act, as stated in the IMF's 2002 assessment. Furthermore, per the World Bank's 2003 report on Corporate Governance, "enforcement of company and securities laws is relatively strong in Hungary" (p. 2). Following amendments to the Capital Markets Act in July 2005, new regulation on the PSZAF's sanctioning policies were also enacted.
This principle is fully implemented, as reported in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. The IMF's 2002 assessment noted that PSZAF had the authority to "assess fines, temporarily revoke a license or appoint a supervisory commissioner, and initiate and conduct full-scale administrative proceedings/inquiries" (p. 51-52). Furthermore, enforcement powers of the PSZAF were strengthened under the Capital Markets Act. Amendments to the law in 2003 empowered the PSZAF to conduct risk-based inspections, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the supervisory framework. Furthermore, comprehensive inspections are carried out twice a year. Per the World Bank's 2003 report on Corporate Governance, "enforcement of company and securities laws is relatively strong in Hungary" (p. 2).
This principle is fully implemented, as reported in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. Per the report, "the PSZAF may enter into cooperation agreements and exchange information with foreign financial supervisory organizations so as to improve facilities to carry out its duties, to achieve supervision on a consolidated basis, and to promote integration programs." Following amendments to the Capital Markets Act in July 2005, as noted in the EBRD's 2004 assessment, new regulation on international cooperation requirements was enacted. Furthermore, according to the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, the PSZAF has enhanced its cooperation with foreign counterparts in recent years. It also concluded bilateral MoUs with Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, the Netherlands, and the Slovak Republic, and joined the IOSCO MMoU in 2003.
This principle is fully implemented, according to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. The IOSCO MMoU is based on the thirty IOSCO Principles adopted in 1998 and the experience gathered by securities regulators in using bilateral MoUs. The IOSCO MMoU provides a standardized framework for sharing enforcement-related information and a gradually expanding network of participating regulatory agencies. IOSCO members who wish to sign the IOSCO MMoU participate in a comprehensive screening process to establish that they have the legal capacity to fully comply with the terms of the IOSCO MMoU. Hungary's PSZAF is a signatory to the MMoU and an ordinary member of IOSCO.
This principle is only partly implemented, according to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. Following an appropriate request, in line with international agreements, as stated in the IMF's 2002 assessment, the PSZAF "may immediately transmit all information that is not qualified as a business secret and/or security secret" (p. 52). While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, it did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
As noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles, this principle is fully implemented. According to the IMF's 2002 assessment "Hungarian disclosure, accounting, and auditing standards are in their formal aspects largely compliant with the relevant international standards" (p. 52). Per the same report, issuers are required to publicly disclose financial results and other information on a regular basis, as well as changes in the ownership structure. In its 2002 assessment, the IMF recommended improving the monitoring and enforcement of reporting requirements. Following amendments to the Capital Markets Act in July 2005, disclosure of information to the PSZAF was strengthened and new regulation was enacted on the issuance of prospectuses prepared for public offerings and the listing of securities. The 2005 IMF FSSA Update notes that disclosure of financial statements for publicly traded companies has been increased from yearly to twice a year.
This principle is fully implemented, according to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, "the provisions of applicable laws as well as the protections afforded to minority shareholders are in line with those in other developed international markets" (p. 52). Furthermore, as noted in the World Bank's 2003 report on Corporate Governance, most basic shareholder rights are protected under the law and practice. However, common shareholders do not always have equal voting rights, and Hungary does not follow the "one share/one vote" principle. The World Bank report recommended "moving further toward this principle by phasing out golden shares and veto shares and removing the possibility for issuance of preferred shares with multiple voting rights" (p. 8).
This principle is broadly implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. According to the IMF's 2002 assessment "Hungarian disclosure, accounting, and auditing standards are in their formal aspects largely compliant with the relevant international standards" (p. 52). The 2002 IMF assessment noted that the PSZAF had legal powers "to inspect books, documents and other relevant information or to request the submission of extraordinary reports, statements and audit reports" (p. 51). Furthermore, according to the World Bank's 2003 report on Corporate Governance, the PSZAF has been particularly active in conducting audits of market participants in every sector of the financial and capital market. As reported in the 2005 IMF FSSA Update, "there has been no evidence of problems with compliance with accounting and auditing standards" (p. 34).
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Furthermore, this principle is broadly implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. The IMF assessment noted that the PSZAF had supervisory authority over investment fund managers, and that specific entry requirements were set up for each type of investment firm.
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Furthermore, this principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles.
This principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regard to this principle. At the time of the 2002 assessment, disclosure requirements of investment funds under the 1996 Securities Act comprised the issuance of a prospectus containing prescribed information. Per the same report, "the prospectus must contain all information necessary to enable an assessment of the operation, investment principles and management of the investment fund, as well as of the risks associated with the investment fund" (p. 52). The Securities Act was replaced by the Capital Markets Act in 2002.
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Furthermore, this principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles.
This principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles, this principle is fully implemented. Per the IMF's 2002 assessment, capital requirements in Hungary "are generally consistent with the Principles and similar requirements in place in other developed markets" (p. 54). Furthermore, both initial and ongoing minimum capital requirements are imposed on market intermediaries. The EU Capital Adequacy Directive was fully transposed into Hungarian law in early 2001. While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, it did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
This principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, it did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
This principle is broadly implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, "the PSZAF may appoint one or more supervisory commissioners to assume control of any distressed investment if the firm appears unable to meet its obligations; its board of directors, (or any executive) is not capable of fulfilling its responsibilities and it poses risks to investors or the markets; or the deficiencies in the firm's accounting or internal control systems are of such gravity that assessing accurately the financial position of the enterprise becomes unlikely"(p. 53). While the 2002 IMF assessment found that Hungary's securities regulatory regime conformed in most material respects with the IOSCO Principles, as noted in the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, it did not directly address Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Under the Capital Markets Act, per the IMF's 2002 assessment, the BSE is a self-regulating, and self-governing body. Furthermore, the rules applicable to the BSE trading system are adopted by the BSE itself. At the time of the IMF's 2005 FSSA Update, the PSZAF had supervisory authority over both the BSE and the BCE. In September 2005, the BCE was integrated into the BSE. However, this principle is only broadly implemented, according to the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment, which notes that the practical incorporation of trading rules of the BSE into the IT environment remains outside of the PSZAF's on-site examinations. Furthermore, regulation of the stock exchange does not include rules or mechanisms on market dispute resolutions.
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Furthermore, this principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. The 2002 IMF assessment noted that the PSZAF monitored market activity independently of the BSE, and did not rely exclusively on information obtained from the BSE.
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Furthermore, this principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. As reported in the World Bank's 2003 assessment, Hungary has a comprehensive system of information disclosure, where companies must adhere to the Capital Markets Act requirements and present all information investors need to make informed decisions.. Furthermore, listed companies are required to comply with the BSE's more detailed disclosure rules.
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Furthermore, this principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. In its 2005 FSSA Update, the IMF noted that there had been significant improvements in the detection and enforcement capabilities of the PSZAF, given the limited monitoring activities by the BSE. Per the same report, market abuse and insider trading activities are under the surveillance of the Market Conduct Oversight Department of the PSZAF. As reported in the EBRD's 2004 assessment, amendments to the Capital Markets Act extended the scope of the definitions of "insider," "insider trading," and "market manipulation" in line with EU directives.
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Furthermore, this principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles.
According to the IMF's 2002 assessment, no action was required with regards to this principle. Furthermore, this principle is fully implemented, as noted in the PSZAF's 2005 self-assessment based on IOSCO Principles. |
Jump to other standards Sources of Assessment European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, "Commercial Laws of Hungary: An Assessment by the EBRD," December 2005. Available from European Bank for Reconstruction and Development website. Accessed on March 10, 2008. (EBRD 2005) Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority, "Self Assessment Based on IOSCO Principles," 2006. Available from Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority website. Accessed on March 10, 2008. (PSZAF 2006) International Monetary Fund, "Hungary: Financial System Stability Assessment Follow-up, including Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes on the following topics: Monetary and Financial Policy Transparency, Banking Supervision, Securities Regulation, Insurance Regulation, and Payment Systems," Country Report No. 2/112, Washington, D.C.: IMF, June 2002. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on March 10, 2008. (IMF 2002) International Monetary Fund, "Hungary: Financial System Stability Assessment Update, including a Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes on Insurance Regulation," Country Report No. 05/212, Washington, D.C.: IMF, June 2005. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on March 10, 2008. (IMF 2005) Relevant Organizations Budapest Stock Exchange -- Budapesti Értéktőzsde (BSE) Central Clearing House and Depository (KELER) Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority -- Pénzügyi Szervezetek Állami Felügyelete (PSZAF) Ministry of Finance -- Miniszterelnöki Hivatal (MoF) (in Hungarian only) National Bank of Hungary -- Magyar Nemzeti Bank (MNB) Unicredit Bank Hungary Vienna Stock Exchange -- Wiener Börse (VSE) Relevant Legislation/Regulation Act on Capital Market No. CXX, 2002 (last amended in 2007) Regulations of the Budapest Stock Exchange, 2007 Budapest Stock Exchange -- Corporate Governance Recommendations, 2007 Act on the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority, 1999 Supplementary Sources Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority, "Annual Report 2006," 2007. Available from Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority website. Accessed on March 10, 2008. (PSZAF 2007) International Organization of Securities Commissions website. Accessed on March 10, 2008. (IOSCO website) www.iosco.org U.S. Department of Commerce, "Doing Business in the Czech Republic: A Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies," U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State, February 2008. Available from U.S. Department of Commerce website. Accessed on March 10, 2008. (U.S. DoC 2008) World Bank, "Hungary: Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes -- Corporate Governance Country Assessment," February 2003. Available from World Bank website. Accessed on March 10, 2008. (WB 2003) |