

|
Browse Profiles > Hungary > International Financial Reporting Standards |
| Score | Rank | |
| Standards Compliance Index | 66.67 out of 100 | 5 |
| Business Indicator Index | 10.98 out of 12 | 3 |
Hungary|
International Financial Reporting Standards
The Hungarian accounting framework is primarily governed by the Act on Accounting, which includes the Hungarian Accounting Standards (HASs). The Act is supplemented by government decrees dealing with special provisions for banks, insurance companies, stockbrokers, investment funds, pension funds, and nonprofit entities. The HASs, according to a 2004 World Bank assessment, differ from the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), despite significant efforts at harmonization. In accordance with the European Commission (EC) Regulation No. 1606/2002, Hungary requires the application of IFRSs in the preparation of consolidated financial statements of listed companies, but this requirement is not extended to other types of companies. The 2006 EC report on the implementation of the Regulation No. 1606/2002 points out that Hungary permits application of IFRSs in consolidated accounts of all other entities, but not in the annual accounts, which must be prepared following national requirements. The use of IFRSs in the annual accounts is allowed for informal purposes only. The EC report notes that the Hungarian position on annual accounts is unlikely to change until all tax and legal issues arising due to the application of IFRSs are resolved. The 2004 World Bank assessment recommends adoption of IFRSs for all public interest entities, and noted that the Hungarian Accounting Standards Board (HASB) established at the time of the assessment is expected to converge the Hungarian accounting requirements with IFRSs within 6 to 8 years. However, as of March 2008, no information as to the progress made by the HASB is publicly available. General Overview In June 2004, the World Bank conducted a review of accounting and auditing practices in Hungary in order to evaluate the weaknesses and strengths of the accounting and auditing requirements and to compare the reporting requirements with actual practices. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), formerly International Accounting Standards (IASs), and International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) were used as the benchmarks for assessing national standards. The Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) was published the same year, summarizing the results of the assessment and a suggesting a reform agenda. In this report, the World Bank noted that "there has been a substantial effort in Hungary to reduce the differences between Hungarian Accounting Standards (HAS) and IFRSs but some significant differences remain" (p. 8). The ROSC further explained that supporters of HASs contend that the national standards "are based on the same logic, philosophy and concepts as IFRSs and are, therefore, very similar to IFRS" (p. 8). However, others argue that the Hungarian standards are heavily influenced by taxation rules which, in certain cases, are in conflict with the international standards.The Principles
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2004 World Bank report, the HAS 17 definition of extraordinary items is broader that the definition provided by IFRSs. According to the World Bank, "HAS specifically require the classification of specific gains and losses as extraordinary items; whereas International Accounting Standards (IAS) 8, Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Fundamental Errors and Changes in Accounting Policies, requires those items to be classified as ordinary items" (p. 11).
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2004 World Bank report, "while IAS 11International Accounting Standards (IAS) 11, Construction Contracts, and IAS 18, Revenue, require that revenue and costs on service and construction contracts should be recorded based on the stage or percentage of completion. Under this stage-of-completion method, contract revenue is matched with the contract costs incurred in reaching the stage of completion, resulting in the reporting of revenue, expenses and profit, which can be attributed to the proportion or percentage of work completed. The IFRS method provides useful information on the extent of contract activity and performance during a period, which is not available in HAS financial statements" (p. 9).
According to the 2004 World Bank report, "HAS do not mention deferred tax accounting; whereas International Accounting Standards (IAS) 12, Income Taxes, requires that an enterprise recognize the amount of current and future tax related to events that have been recognized in financial accounting income"(p. 9).
According to the 2004 World Bank report, "HAS do not require that information be reported for business segments and geographical segments" (p. 9).
According to the 2004 KPMG report, "if assets are revalued upwards, the revaluation surplus must be recognized directly in equity and presented separately as a revaluation reserve. Subsequent adjustments in the revaluation surplus are charged directly against the revaluation reserve; the depreciation charge recognized in the profit and loss account is based on the historical cost" (p. 27). However, no comprehensive comparison of Hungarian standards with IFRSs exists to assess the level of compliance with IAS 16.
According to the 2004 KPMG report, "assets purchased under finance leases must be capitalized. However the definition of a finance lease is much more restricted under HAL [Hungarian Accounting Law] than under International Financial Reporting Standards, and most lease agreements in Hungary are structured as operating leases for HAL purposes" (p. 27).
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2004 World Bank report, HASs "require that foreign exchange differences arising in reporting an enterprise's long-term liabilities at rates different from those at which they were initially recorded during the period, or reported in previous financial statements, should be recognized as an asset (rather than as an expense) when the debt is associated with the acquisition of fixed assets. Such capitalization could result in overstated fixed assets, and the deferral of foreign exchange losses (or gains) may not comply with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates" (pp. 8-9).
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2004 World Bank report, the definition of related parties under HAS and IFRS differ thereby leading to differences in disclosure practices. For instance, "HAS require disclosures of the name of subsidiaries, associates, jointly-managed companies, other enterprises with a share ownership relationship, and loans and advances to directors, management and the supervisory board" (p. 10), the report noted.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2003 PWC report, "the basis of consolidation is the parent company's accounting policy, and adjustments should be made to the subsidiaries' accounts if their accounting policy is materially different" (p. 48). However, no comprehensive comparison of Hungarian standards with IFRSs exists to exactly assess the level of compliance with IAS 27.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2004 KPMG report, "under Hungarian Accounting Standards (HASs), inflation accounting is not permitted" (p. 32).
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2004 KPMG report, "fair valuation of financial instruments and hedge accounting may be applied optionally from 2003. If fair valuation is applied, the classification of financial instruments and the recognition and measurement requirements are similar to that of International Accounting Standards 32 and IAS 39" (p. 30). However, there is no further information on exactly how this standard complies with the requirements of IAS 32.
According to the 2004 KPMG report, "the disclosure requirements in Hungary are less extensive than under International Financial Reporting Standards. Under Hungarian Accounting Standards, there is no requirement to disclose earnings per share" (p. 22).
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2004 World Bank report, "HAS require provisions to be recorded based on criteria that may not comply with IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, and International Accounting Standards 39," and the report added that "generally, because of the influence of taxation on HAS, provisions are likely to be understated as compared to IFRS" (p. 9).
According to the 2004 World Bank report, "HAS permit/require that intangible assets and start-up costs should be capitalized (rather than expensed) in circumstances that may not be permitted by International Accounting Standards 38, Intangible Assets" (p. 9).
According to the 2004 World Bank report, "HAS require provisions to be recorded based on criteria that may not comply with IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, and International Accounting Standard 39," adding that "generally, because of the influence of taxation on HAS, provisions are likely to be understated as compared to IFRS" (p. 9).
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with the principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Hungary's compliance with this principle. |
Jump to other standards Sources of Assessment Chamber of Hungarian Auditors, "Assessment of the Regulatory and Standard- Setting Framework," Self-assessment prepared as part of the International Federation of Accountants' (IFAC) Member Body Compliance Program, July 2005. Available from International Federation of Accountants website. Accessed on March 4, 2008. (CHA 2005) Chamber of Hungarian Auditors, "Response to the IFAC Part 2, SMO Self-Assessment Questionnaire," Self-assessment prepared as a part of the International Federation of Accountants' (IFAC) Member Body Compliance Program, February 2007. Available from International Federation of Accountants website. Accessed on March 4, 2008. (CHA 2007) European Commission, "Planned Implementation of the IAS Regulation (1606/2002) in the EU and EEA (Published for information purposes only)," May 2006. Available from European Commission website. Accessed on March 4, 2008. (EC 2006) KPMG, "Investment in Hungary," August 2004. Available from KPMG website. Accessed on March 4, 2008. (KPMG 2004) World Bank, "Hungary: Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) -- Accounting and Auditing," June 2004. Available from World Bank website. Accessed on March 4, 2008. (WB 2004) Relevant Organizations Accounting Regulatory Committee (ARC) Budapest Stock Exchange -- Budapesti Értéktőzsde (BSE) Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) Chamber of Hungarian Auditors -- Magyar Könyvvizsgálói Kamara (CHA) European Commission (EC) European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) Federation des Experts Comptables Europeens (FEE) Hungarian Accounting Standards Board (HASB) Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority -- Pénzügyi Szervezetek Állami Felügyelete (PSZAF) Ministry of Finance -- Miniszterelnöki Hivatal (MH) National Bank of Hungary -- Magyar Nemzeti Bank (MNB) Relevant Legislation/Regulation Accounting Act, 2000 Act on the Chamber of Hungarian Auditors and Auditing Activities No. LV, 1997 Act on the Chamber of Hungarian Auditors and Auditing Activities No. LXXV, 2007 Code of Ethics of the Chamber of Hungarian Auditors, 2004 Act on Capital Market No. CXX, 2001 (last amended in 2007) Act on Central Bank No. LVIII, 2001 Rules and Regulations of the Budapest Stock Exchange Government Decree on Special Provisions Regarding the Annual Reporting and Bookkeeping Obligations of Credit Institutions and Financial Enterprises 250/2000 Government Decree on Reporting and Bookkeeping Requirements of Insurers 192/2000 Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of On the Application of International Accounting Standards (EC) No 1606, 2002 (Regulation No 1606/2002) EU Accounting-Related Directives Supplementary Sources International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) website, Accessed on March 4, 2008. (IFAC website) PricewaterhouseCoopers, "Doing Business and Investing in Hungary," 2003. Available from PricewaterhouseCoopers website. Accessed on March 4, 2008. (PWC 2003) UHY, "Doing Business in Hungary," 2006. Available from the UHY website. Accessed on March 4, 2008. |